I am a big fan of Senator James Webb. I am a big fan because he is a true conservative and in the biggest decision of the last 10 years, whether to take the United States into a long term war with no end in site or not, he was absolutely right in saying we should not do it. He was, actually, prophetic in his prediction of what would happen if went to war in Iraq and he wrote it down in a Washington Post Article so no one can dispute that he made the call.
I attach a copy of the article for your reading pleasure but here are some highlights. First, he reminds us that there are other ways to accomplish your task you need to get done without going into a "hot" war. Indeed, shooting wars should be the last resort. He reminds us that we won the Cold War through continued political and military maneuvering without ever firing a meaningful shot (For the neocon nuts who will respond, please don't tell me the USSR went down because we invaded Grenada). He asks the appropriate question:
"Is there an absolutely vital national interest that should lead us from containment to unilateral war and a long-term occupation of Iraq? And would such a war and its aftermath actually increase our ability to win the war against international terrorism?"
Of course what is so insighful in this question is he is actually thinking about what happens after we invade and occupy Iraq. Something apparently Bush, Cheney and Rumsfeld missed in the planning process. He goes on:
"The first reality (of war) is that wars often have unintended consequences -- ask the Germans, who in World War I were convinced that they would defeat the French in exactly 42 days. The second is that a long-term occupation of iraq would beyond doubt require an adjustment of force levels elsewhere, and could eventually diminish American Influence in other parts of the world"
Is this not what has happenned? We have no military credibility with North Korea because they know we can't do anything about what they are doing. Same with Iran. China just happily ignores us like a stuck lion who cannot even get up let alone fight. Some key words Webb used here were "Long term occupation of Iraq". Yes, he predicted exactly what would happen (Remember Rummy and Bush saying no one could have possibly known what would happen in Iraq? Guess they do not read the Washington Post.)
Webb goes on to idenfity that occupying Iraq would not be like the relative docile nature of the Japanese occupation. He says:
"In Japan, American occupation forces quickly became 50,000 friends. In Iraq, they would quickly become 50,000 terrorist targets."
Wow... was that a prediction or what? He then goes on to very succintly outline why our planned invasion of Iraq would be a huge windfall for China. Miring the US down in a war with the Muslim world would allow China to become dominant. And, as we have seen, that has happenned in a big way.
You should read this article, study it and keep reminding yourself it was written before the invasion as a treatise and prediction of what would happen if we invaded.
This man should be the Democratic Vice President and could then become President. The Democrats would become the party of true conservatives and the Republicans would be set aside for what they are: Neo Conservative raving lunatics.
Read: Senator Webb Predicts What Will Happen in Iraq
Tags: Webb, Senator Webb, Iraq, War, Vice President, Obama